2026-06-11.log

- bkeys (QUIT: Remote host closed the connection) (~Thunderbi@134.22.115.162)00:15
- rodion_goritskov (QUIT: Remote host closed the connection) (~rodion_go@mail.goritskov.com)00:44
+ rodion_goritskov (~rodion_go@mail.goritskov.com)00:45
- mjw (QUIT: Ping timeout: 256 seconds) (~mjw@gnu.wildebeest.org)01:54
+ paperManu_ (~paperManu@204.244.197.237)03:32
- paperManu (QUIT: Ping timeout: 245 seconds) (~paperManu@204.244.197.237)03:56
- paperManu_ (QUIT: Ping timeout: 244 seconds) (~paperManu@204.244.197.237)04:01
+ spew (~spew@user/spew)04:17
- spew (QUIT: Quit: nyaa~) (~spew@user/spew)04:29
+ talos7 (~talos@2600:6c5d:f0:1fd0:5c22:c70:847e:48fd)04:48
- talos (QUIT: Ping timeout: 248 seconds) (~talos@2600:6c5d:f0:1fd0:d2ab:681d:6a9b:9852)04:50
* talos7 -> talos04:50
- cobra (QUIT: Ping timeout: 245 seconds) (~cobra@user/Cobra)05:45
+ cobra (~cobra@user/Cobra)05:46
- cobra (QUIT: Ping timeout: 245 seconds) (~cobra@user/Cobra)06:00
+ cobra (~cobra@user/Cobra)06:04
- lidstah (QUIT: Remote host closed the connection) (~lidstah@gateway/tor-sasl/lidstah)06:41
+ lidstah (~lidstah@gateway/tor-sasl/lidstah)06:41
+ vagrantc (~vagrant@2600:3c01:e000:21:7:77:0:50)06:46
- vagrantc (QUIT: Quit: leaving) (~vagrant@2600:3c01:e000:21:7:77:0:50)06:51
- aloo_shu (QUIT: Read error: Connection reset by peer) (~aloo_shu@85.51.18.58)08:05
+ aloo_shu (~aloo_shu@85.51.18.58)08:06
- lidstah (QUIT: Remote host closed the connection) (~lidstah@gateway/tor-sasl/lidstah)08:09
+ lidstah (~lidstah@gateway/tor-sasl/lidstah)08:09
+ andreas-e (~Andreas@2a02-8434-b6a3-e901-daca-beef-9a0a-5e34.rev.sfr.net)08:24
- andreas-e (QUIT: Remote host closed the connection) (~Andreas@2a02-8434-b6a3-e901-daca-beef-9a0a-5e34.rev.sfr.net)08:24
+ andreas-e (~Andreas@2a02-8434-b6a3-e901-daca-beef-9a0a-5e34.rev.sfr.net)08:33
- robin (QUIT: Read error: Connection reset by peer) (~robin@user/terpri)10:30
+ robin (~robin@user/terpri)10:31
- andreas-e (QUIT: Quit: Leaving) (~Andreas@2a02-8434-b6a3-e901-daca-beef-9a0a-5e34.rev.sfr.net)10:39
* asjackson_ -> asjackson10:56
+ mjw (~mjw@gnu.wildebeest.org)11:02
- talos (QUIT: Read error: Connection reset by peer) (~talos@2600:6c5d:f0:1fd0:5c22:c70:847e:48fd)11:07
+ talos4 (~talos@35.151.128.31)11:07
- ndufresne (QUIT: Quit: The Lounge - https://thelounge.chat) (~ndufresne@apple.collaboradmins.com)11:42
+ ndufresne (~ndufresne@apple.collaboradmins.com)11:43
- lidstah (QUIT: Ping timeout: 245 seconds) (~lidstah@gateway/tor-sasl/lidstah)12:08
+ lidstah (~lidstah@gateway/tor-sasl/lidstah)12:09
+ paperManu (~paperManu@204.244.197.237)12:37
+ alcedo (~alcedo@user/alcedo)13:02
- murphnj (QUIT: Ping timeout: 248 seconds) (~murphnj@user/murphnj)14:09
+ murphnj (~murphnj@user/murphnj)14:10
- mjw (QUIT: Quit: Leaving) (~mjw@gnu.wildebeest.org)14:18
- paperManu (QUIT: Ping timeout: 246 seconds) (~paperManu@204.244.197.237)14:24
+ mjw (~mjw@gnu.wildebeest.org)14:50
johlOh my, changing the user icon that GDM displays for login is much more confusing than I thought. Anyone has done that?14:53
- mjw (QUIT: Ping timeout: 245 seconds) (~mjw@gnu.wildebeest.org)14:56
+ paperManu (~paperManu@modemcable141.205-200-24.mc.videotron.ca)14:59
alcedojohl: Does this work? (https://github.com/orgs/gdm-settings/discussions/254)15:09
* Guest3708 -> mjw15:17
- jogu (QUIT: Remote host closed the connection) (~jogu@user/jogu)15:50
+ jogu (~jogu@user/jogu)15:51
johlalcedo: Not really what the setting app would be16:06
- cellmoose (QUIT: Quit: ZNC - https://znc.in) (~cellmoose@tilde.green)16:11
+ cellmoose (cellmoose@znc.tilde.green)16:30
- cellmoose (QUIT: Client Quit) (cellmoose@znc.tilde.green)16:32
+ cellmoose (cellmoose@znc.tilde.green)16:42
- alcedo (QUIT: Quit: alcedo) (~alcedo@user/alcedo)17:02
+ alcedo (~alcedo@user/alcedo)17:13
alcedo?quit17:22
- alcedo (QUIT: Quit: alcedo) (~alcedo@user/alcedo)17:22
- Gooberpatrol66 (QUIT: Remote host closed the connection) (~Gooberpat@user/gooberpatrol66)17:23
+ vagrantc (~vagrant@2600:3c01:e000:21:7:77:0:50)18:04
- paperManu (QUIT: Ping timeout: 276 seconds) (~paperManu@modemcable141.205-200-24.mc.videotron.ca)18:41
+ wielaard (~mjw@gnu.wildebeest.org)19:09
+ Gooberpatrol66 (~Gooberpat@user/gooberpatrol66)19:11
minutejohl: normally gnome settings -> system -> users19:13
* mjw -> Guest736619:15
- Guest7366 (QUIT: Killed (gallium.libera.chat (Nickname regained by services))) (~mjw@2001:1c06:2486:4600:5952:3a9:6e0e:555a)19:15
* wielaard -> mjw19:15
+ Guest7366 (~mjw@2001:1c06:2486:4600:5952:3a9:6e0e:555a)19:15
+ alcedo (~alcedo@user/alcedo)19:48
alcedoI apologize for the random message sent here. BTRFS decided to implode today, so I accidently sent the command here :(19:50
alcedoThe Qualcomm chip in the Quasar: it's an industrial chip, right? How does it compare to the RK3588? Skimming the benchmarks, I can see that it's ~20% faster than the latter, but is there something else notable about it?20:13
alcedoSuspend support?20:14
joschalcedo: yes, suspend/resume works20:23
joschMNT has one too! https://socel.net/@heyheymomo/11673197195808608220:28
alcedojosch: Well, that IS amazing!20:34
alcedoIs it only "modern" standby, or is it suspend-to-RAM?20:35
Zabathere’s nothing lesser about “modern standby”, it just means the OS drivers are fully in control of power management instead of handing over to opaque firmware (ACPI in case of PCs)20:49
f_"Skimming the benchmarks, I can see that it's ~20% faster than the latter" as I understand it QCS6490 is about as fast as RK358820:53
f_but less heat20:53
- alcedo (QUIT: Ping timeout: 248 seconds) (~alcedo@user/alcedo)20:54
f_honestly thinking of getting qcs6490 instead of rk358820:55
+ alcedo (~alcedo@user/alcedo)20:55
alcedoZaba: I can say from experience that s2idle... isn't really that great.20:56
alcedoAt least for my machine, that is.20:56
alcedof_: This is where I pulled the benchmarks from: https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/4906vs6451/Rockchip-RK3588-vs-Qualcomm-QCS649020:58
f_interesting!20:59
alcedoCan't guarantee its trustworthiness, though.20:59
f_If only the CPU mark was 6490 instead of 6090 :P20:59
f_yeah I guess it would throttle less than RK3588 because it really is more power-efficient (IIRC)21:00
f_and RK3588 is slightly faster than my current i7-2630QM fwiw21:00
alcedof_: What PC are you on to have a Sandy bridge?21:01
alcedothinkpad?21:01
Zabaalcedo: well yes, it’s up to the OS to actually reach the lowest power modes with it, but the good thing is that it’s transparent to the OS so it can be fixed in the kernel 21:06
alcedoZaba: still, it can't reach the same amount of power saving as s2ram can21:12
f_alcedo: HP from 2011 of course ;)21:40
f_Not a fan of the shiny new thin laptops21:42
f_but I think RK3588 MNT Reform Next or the QCS6490 one would make a perfect replacement :)21:49
f_an upgrade even21:49
- alcedo (QUIT: Ping timeout: 244 seconds) (~alcedo@user/alcedo)21:58
+ alcedo (~alcedo@user/alcedo)22:00
- alcedo (QUIT: Ping timeout: 248 seconds) (~alcedo@user/alcedo)22:08
+ alcedo (~alcedo@user/alcedo)22:10
- alcedo (QUIT: Ping timeout: 245 seconds) (~alcedo@user/alcedo)22:19
+ alcedo (~alcedo@user/alcedo)22:20
- alcedo (QUIT: Client Quit) (~alcedo@user/alcedo)22:24
- S0rin (QUIT: Quit: WeeChat 4.6.3) (~S0rin@user/s0rin)23:31
- aelius (QUIT: Ping timeout: 276 seconds) (~aelius@user/aelius)23:42

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!